Please click and join our letter to Congress
For more than a century since the San Remo conference which planned and initiated the reconstitution of the Jewish nation state on their historic homeland, conflict had plagued the region between the Jewish state and their Arab neighbors. Countless ideas, resolutions, mediations and agreements had been advanced to resolve the conflict but they all failed and the contention appeared intractable. These past ideas and solutions all share a basic common idea anchored on “land for peace”. They all have been an utter failure.
It’s said that it is a mark of insanity to keep repeating the same thing all over and expecting a different result.
On May 21, 2017, President Trump put forward a vision during the Arab Islamic American Summit in Saudi Arabia that resonates deeply with the fundamental principles of the United States, rooted in freedom, prosperity, and the unwavering pursuit of peace. He stated:
“Our vision is one of peace, security, and prosperity, in this region and in the world. Our goal is a coalition of nations that share the aim of stamping out extremism and providing our children with a hopeful future that honors God.”
These honorable words serve as a powerful testament to the ideals of hope and progress, emphasizing our collective duty to foster an environment where peace and prosperity can flourish, thus creating a hopeful future for generations to come.
That vision remains relevant today in President Trump’s plan for a new thriving Gaza and the resettlement of Gazans. This noble initiative is a moral imperative rooted in humanity, justice, and coexistence. It continues the President’s Middle East vision, which led to unprecedented peace agreements between Israel and Arab states, including the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. Trump’s willingness to explore this unconventional solution is commendable as the prevalent ones failed miserably. Many doubted the possibility of such peace agreements, yet President Trump has proven otherwise, embodying his promise that “in America, the impossible is what we do best.”
To advocate for peace is to embrace a future devoid of violence and extremism. By supporting the relocation of those who have been radicalized, the plan is not just addressing the symptoms of conflict; it will be tackling its roots. The current environment in which these individuals find themselves is fraught with the potential for further conflict and animosity. Relocating them to secure and supportive environments, as we have seen in various Arab nations can provide a foundation for rehabilitation and reintegration into society, free from the shackles of terrorism and prejudice.
This initiative is about more than just physical relocation; it is about offering a chance for transformation. Individuals who have been led down a path of radicalization often do so in response to a myriad of socio-economic and political factors. By providing them with the opportunity to build new lives in different safe and nurturing environments, we can foster understanding, tolerance, and ultimately, peace.
Let us acknowledge that this mass relocation is not unprecedented in history. Relocating populations can be justified in the interest of peace and their own security. For instance, at the end of World War II, the United States and the United Kingdom relocated approximately 3 million ethnic Germans from the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia back to Germany. Similarly, the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947 resulted in the movement of millions of people, ultimately leading to a level of peace between the two nations. These historical precedents illustrate that while mass relocations can be complex and challenging initially, they have sometimes been deemed necessary to foster future peace and security for affected populations.
Furthermore, it is essential to recognize that supporting this relocation is an act of compassion, a recognition of our shared humanity. By choosing to intervene and offer these individuals a second chance, we are not just investing in their futures, but also in the future of the communities they will join. It is a proactive step towards dismantling the ideologies that perpetuate violence and hatred.
Critics may argue that such a solution is impractical or that it would overlook the complexities of the situation. However, none of the earlier tried recommendations have succeeded. A new way needs to be tried and the cycle of sufferings and death cannot continue.
The prevailing approach to Gaza by the United Nations has, until now, proven to be a significant obstacle to peace. It maintains the status quo that perpetuates Gazans’ status as eternal refugees and fosters a victimhood mentality. This perspective creates a dangerous narrative that excuses or justifies the heinous crimes by Hamas, enabling the organization to evade accountability while diminishing the suffering of Israelis.
The above must be viewed in the context of the horrific events of October 7 resulting in an unprecedented massacre of civilians and marking one of the darkest days in Israel’s recent history. Of note is that Hamas promised to repeat it again with the cheering on of many Gazans and western college students who latched on to the fostered victim mentality and eternal refugee status.
The situation in Gaza has reached a dead end. With billions in aid being wasted without tangible progress, we need not allow this to continue. Our commitment to humanity compels us to stand against not only the violence itself but also the policies that enable such acts and turn a blind eye to their victims.
Another unfortunate aspect of this conflict, often overlooked by global elites who perpetuate the Gazans’ victimhood narrative, is that the prevailing Palestinian narrative has inflamed antisemitism and fostered intolerance towards Jews worldwide. Islamist groups exploit this propaganda to incite hatred, terror, and promote global boycotts against Jews. This growing sentiment is deeply concerning and undermines the principles of coexistence and mutual respect.
Previous peace initiatives have frequently neglected the sovereign rights of Jews to Gaza and Judea as specified in the mandate. The narrative surrounding the alleged theft of Palestine is often rooted in steep misunderstanding and historical distortion. Gaza and Judea Samaria are integral to Jewish heritage and homeland, supported by international law as outlined in the Mandate for Palestine and other legal agreements. The land granted to Gazans by Israel was an act of kindness and compromise aimed at fostering peace which has failed.The acceptance of Gazans’ victimhood has obscured the rights of Jews beneath a tide of vicious propaganda. The Jewish commitment to finding a solution has tragically shifted from “land for peace” to “land for terrorism,” creating an illusion among Gazans that escalating acts of terror will result in the acquisition of more Israeli territory.
In conclusion, if we are genuinely committed to fostering peace and humanity in the region, we must support the relocation of Gazans. This is not just a logistical challenge; it is a moral one. Let us choose to embrace compassion, understanding, and proactive engagement in the quest for a more peaceful world. By doing so, we can pave the way for a future free from the specters of terrorism and enmity, allowing for a new chapter of coexistence and hope.
We stand in support of President Trump’s bold vision to relocate Gazans for a lasting peace in the Middle East peace. This is actually the first policy in a century that truly deserves our loud support.